Go Summarize

Design Is [Autonomous] – In Conversation with Ryan Powell, Melissa Cefkin, and Wendy Ju

Google Design2018-04-13
design#material#google#google design#designers#design is#design series#design event#design events#self driving car#trust#feedback#communication#robot#pedestrian#street#safe driving#ux
4K views|6 years ago
💫 Short Summary

The video segment features researchers and designers specializing in autonomous vehicles, discussing the importance of communication, interface design, and trust-building in self-driving cars. They explore human-robot interactions, sensor data usage, and sound design to enhance user experience and safety. The Renault Nissan Mitsubishi Alliance Lab focuses on AI algorithms and customer engagement, while studies on pedestrian interactions with autonomous cars reveal insights into human behavior. Challenges in designing for public environments and evolving car ownership models are also addressed, emphasizing the need for understanding and adapting to the changing landscape of autonomous technology.

✨ Highlights
📊 Transcript
Introduction to Researchers and Designers in Autonomous Vehicles.
00:10
Ryan Powell leads the UX design team at Waymo, bringing experience from Google, Samsung, Xbox, and Motorola.
Wendy Joo specializes in human-robot interactions, while Melissa Sathyan is a design anthropologist at Nissan Research.
Ryan discusses Waymo's transition into a service and the emphasis on consumer experience.
The segment sets the stage for presentations on the role of design in shaping the future of autonomous vehicles.
Importance of communication in autonomous vehicles.
04:46
Building trust between passengers and technology is crucial for the success of autonomous vehicles.
Interface design aims to replicate the communication experience passengers have with human drivers.
Sensor data is utilized to create a user-friendly interface for passengers.
Engineers use the X view image for development, while designers focus on translating sensor data into understandable information for users.
The 3D scene in the car interface provides a visual representation of the car's surroundings.
06:26
It displays the car's trajectory, road surfaces, pedestrians, cyclists, and nearby vehicles as simple shapes.
Buildings are included in the scene to offer context of the journey.
Construction zones with traffic cones are rendered to alert passengers of changing road conditions.
This feature aims to reduce stress for riders, enhance safety, and improve the overall user experience.
The importance of user interaction in distinguishing emergency vehicles and regular vehicles through a user interface.
09:54
Utilizing active crosswalks to draw attention and mimic human driver behavior.
Periodically revealing data to prevent information overload and creating a 3D representation of the car's surroundings.
Encouraging users to glance up to ensure the car's understanding and identify pedestrians or cyclists.
Importance of Status Layer in Autonomous Vehicles.
11:13
The status layer provides direct communication to users about traffic situations, such as recognizing green lights and school zones.
Vehicles yield to pedestrians and communicate their actions to users, enhancing safety and transparency.
Sound design in the user experience is crucial, with Connor O'Sullivan mentioned as the sound designer at Google.
The team at Google is focused on improving the audio experience within autonomous vehicles, with recruitment opportunities available within the team.
The Renault Nissan Mitsubishi Alliance Lab Innovation Lab of Silicon Valley focuses on autonomous vehicle development, connected cars, and mobility services.
13:47
The lab works on projects related to autonomous vehicle behavior, customer engagement, and vehicle interactions with other road users.
They explore direct and indirect communications on the road and opportunities for service design.
The lab contributes to AV development through artificial intelligence algorithms, HMI work, and core technology system development.
Importance of Field Studies and Empirical Work in Understanding Human Reactions to Autonomous Vehicles.
16:35
Complexity of interactions on the road, including conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles determining right of way.
Constant reading and interpreting of situations by people on the road, illustrating a dance of micro coordination and sociality.
Future implications of removing human drivers and the need for understanding human experiences in these moments are also addressed.
Discussion on movement practices in different settings, using Tehran roundabouts as examples.
21:41
Emphasis on communicative practices and expectations when navigating busy streets.
Highlighting humans' adaptability to different environments and quick decision-making abilities.
Showcasing scenes from Mashhad, an Iranian pilgrimage site attracting global visitors.
Prompting reflection on adapting decision-making practices to be socially acceptable in diverse social contexts.
Wendy G discusses challenges of designing for public environments with autonomous vehicles.
24:05
She stresses the importance of considering socio-technical factors and impact on people's everyday experiences.
Wendy highlights the evolving nature of cars as robots that require negotiation and cooperation.
Her background in human-robot interaction informs her approach to designing for the integration of automation in vehicles.
Techniques used in human-robot interaction.
25:15
The Wizard of Oz method involves a person controlling a device or robot behind the scenes to develop corpuses for natural language understanding.
Puppeteering robots are used to observe human interaction in human-robot interaction.
An on-the-road driving simulator for autonomous cars allows participants to mimic autonomous driving scenarios in a car with hidden drivers.
The goal is to study human behavior in future automated vehicle interactions.
Experiments on pre-cueing road conditions and intent in self-driving cars.
29:37
Unexpected factors were found to be more important than pre-cueing in reducing motion sickness and building trust.
The self-driving car drove cautiously and smoothly, earning trust from passengers.
Despite initial skepticism, passengers perceived the car as friendly and non-malicious, resembling a driving-school instructor.
Building trust and providing human-like interaction are crucial for user comfort with autonomous vehicles.
Research on trust in automation focuses on user beliefs in the competence and safety of the car, rather than malicious intent.
32:49
Field experiments provide insights into user experiences with existing automation, aiding designers in understanding driver behavior.
Video and audio monitoring allows researchers to evaluate user reactions and enhance the driving experience.
The study with Renault and Nissan emphasizes the significance of collecting real-world data for product design and user satisfaction.
Observing drivers in various scenarios offers valuable feedback for engineers to address user concerns and enhance future automation technologies.
Study on interactions between pedestrians and autonomous cars.
35:02
People often interact with safety drivers even when not in control of the car, which could be problematic for future driverless vehicles.
Automatic behaviors can influence pedestrian responses to autonomous cars, sometimes without individuals even realizing they are interacting with the vehicles.
Emphasizes the importance of understanding human behavior and expectations in the context of autonomous technology.
Limitations in gathering data on people's reactions to autonomous cars in the Bay Area.
38:59
Positive reception in Silicon Valley leading to experiments in other areas.
Invitation for graduates to join research on complex interactions and challenges faced by driverless cars.
Testing of intention indicators and simulation of autonomous vehicles with safety drivers in crowded environments.
Emphasis on the need for further exploration in autonomous vehicle technology.
Researching driving styles in different places to understand behavioral differences.
42:26
Challenges in studying driving behaviors due to contextual differences like sign heights and building placements.
Interest in pick-up and drop-off experiences with robots compared to human drivers.
Focus on improving micro interactions like signaling to the driver and smooth out the passenger experience.
Working on features to enhance the robot's ability to pick up passengers at specified locations and navigate to destinations effectively.
Challenges in studying social norms and interactions with vehicles and robots.
44:27
Techniques from stagecraft and comparative anthropology are used to understand these interactions.
Comparative cases are important for predicting future trends and adapting sensor technology in architecture.
Insights from interactions with users of autonomous vehicle services in Phoenix provide valuable information.
Lack of widespread autonomous vehicle usage impacts public perception and acceptance of this technology on the road.
Nissan aims to develop human-like AI for cars, focusing on communication mechanisms and interaction expectations.
46:51
They have experimented with abstract and simple indicators like lighting systems.
The indicators need to be visible from the front and sides, operate discreetly, and cater to fast-moving situations.
Designing for external car communication differs from interior design due to sustained views and distractions.
Additional signaling may be required for effective communication practices, emphasizing simplicity, visibility, and ease of understanding.
Importance of car behavior in pedestrian crossing decisions.
50:17
Clear signaling is crucial for safety when crossing the street.
Challenges in designing communication between cars and riders for trust and proactive communication.
Research focuses on identifying moments of confusion or curiosity in passengers.
Collaboration with sound designer to interrupt user activities for important messages while maintaining trust.
Advanced technology in the car provides 360-degree vision and vision up to three football fields away.
52:17
The interface is designed to showcase intelligence and sophistication without overwhelming the user.
Building trust with passengers includes offering a sense of control, such as the ability to pull over or speak to live support.
Trust in autonomous cars can lead to potential dangers if users become overly reliant on the technology and fail to remain vigilant for machine shortcomings.
Importance of vehicle motion in building trust with autonomous technology.
54:39
Emphasis on the need for smooth and communicative behavior to improve people's lives by relieving anxieties and pressures associated with driving.
Potential benefits in mobility and ecological practices by adopting autonomous technology.
Challenges of human interaction with automation discussed, focusing on training humans to accommodate technology shortcomings.
Overall, the conversation highlights the need for better understanding and interaction with automation, starting with vehicles as a familiar entry point.
The evolving ownership models around vehicles, focusing on self-driving technology and on-demand services.
57:29
The benefits for people with disabilities, enhancing mobility and daily lives.
Ease of prototyping and experimenting within the team, using a closed course in Mountain View for testing.
Testing location at a former shopping mall with reserved spaces for team to work on and test concepts.
Design process for interfaces in autonomous vehicles.
59:35
Testing facility and decision-making for displaying information are key components.
Different scenarios are tested at a closed-circuit facility near San Francisco.
Showcasing what the car senses is prioritized with minimal filtering.
Rendering nearby traffic using laser points and concerns about UI appearance for a larger consumer audience are discussed.
Design choices for autonomous vehicles debated.
01:03:21
Debate focuses on distinct markings versus blending in with regular cars.
Standardization in external features, such as badges or lighting elements, discussed for signifying autonomous capabilities.
Uncertainty exists on how autonomous vehicles should be visually identified and if a universal design choice is necessary.
Emphasis on harmonization in movement patterns and signals across different brands and models for the future of autonomous driving.
Evolution towards fully autonomous vehicles and the importance of exploring different approaches before standardizing.
01:05:27
Designers encouraged to increase choice and embrace diverse implementation options.
Autonomy can manifest in various ways, advocating for exploration over premature decisions.
Offering a variety of vehicle options is significant to cater to different needs and preferences.
Promoting a future with abundant choices for consumers.
Challenges of human-robot interaction in society.
01:07:20
Understanding people's reluctance to accept machines dictating decisions is crucial.
Communication and control mechanisms are necessary in autonomous systems for passenger comfort and agency.
Questioning the ultimate goal of achieving full autonomy in vehicles due to complexities in defining and implementing autonomy.
Exploring the relational nature of autonomy, focusing on freedom from control and the implications of technological advancements.
Advancements in autonomous vehicles and the use of biometrics for passenger comfort.
01:10:51
Nissan's brain-to-vehicle technology at CES analyzes brain activity to customize vehicle settings for comfort.
Challenges of biometric sensing technology in accurately detecting passenger stress levels.
Importance of understanding human emotions beyond physiological indicators like heart rate.
Need for more accurate emotional indicators for improved vehicle interaction.
The discussion focuses on the level of autonomy in vehicles, particularly on level four which is highly autonomous but still requires human intervention for certain situations.
01:12:50
Design considerations and rider expectations play a crucial role in the development of autonomous vehicles, highlighting the importance of accurately visualizing different driving scenarios.
The concept of vehicles communicating with each other, resembling human interaction, is brought up as a potential shift in behavior for autonomous cars.
Emphasis is placed on the need for autonomous vehicles to signal and behave predictably like human drivers, raising questions about the future role of humans in the era of autonomous transportation.
Evolution of transportation infrastructure towards autonomous vehicles.
01:16:35
Potential for vehicles to communicate with each other and infrastructure.
Designers facing challenges in adapting to existing road systems and path dependencies.
Concerns raised about automation pushing other users off the road and the need for a balanced approach.
Emphasis on the importance of engaging with various elements in the environment.
Potential for gaming autonomous vehicles by interacting with pedestrians and safety drivers during testing.
01:19:05
Concerns raised about disruptions and interruptions during testing.
Limited reported cases of rebellion towards autonomous vehicles noted.
Questions on the persistence of such behavior and its impact on testing process.
Audience appreciation for insightful discussion and anticipation for future sessions.