Go Summarize

Lame, But Cheaper: NVIDIA RTX 4080 Super Review, Benchmark Comparison, & Value Discussion

Gamers Nexus2024-01-31
gamersnexus#gamers nexus#computer hardware#NVIDIA RTX 4080 SUPER#nvidia geforce rtx 4080 super#nvidia rtx 4080 super benchmarks#nvidia rtx 4080 super review#nvidia rtx 4080 super vs amd rx 7900 xtx#amd radeon rx 7900 xtx#amd rx 7900 xtx 2024#rx 7900 xtx vs rtx 4080 super#rtx 4080 super vs rtx 4080#rtx 4080 super comparison#rx 7900 xtx rtx 4080 super comparison#rtx 4080 super worth it#best nvidia gpu 2024#best graphics cards 2024#amd vs nvidia gpus 2024
322K views|5 months ago
💫 Short Summary

The video discusses the NVIDIA 480 Super, highlighting its minimal performance improvement over the original 480, the significant price reduction from $1,200 to $1,000, and its value compared to other GPUs. The video also showcases charts and analysis of the 480 Super's performance in various games and workloads, ultimately suggesting that the 480 Super is a better value option at the reduced price.

✨ Highlights
📊 Transcript
The NVIDIA 480 Super has been tested and validated to show only a 1 to 3% improvement over the original 480.
00:00
The 480 Super is priced at $1,000, down from the original $1,200.
The 480 Super and the original 480 are functionally the same card for most purposes.
The difference between the two cards is negligible and would not show up as meaningful in a test environment that isn't clean enough.
The price drop for the 480 Super may feel like a moderate improvement, but it also highlights the high initial price of the card.
The video provides a brief overview of the specifications of the 480 Super, including the number of Cuda cores and the advertised clock bump.
05:28
The new 480 Super has 10,240 Cuda cores, a 5.3% increase from the original 480.
There is a slight advertised clock bump for the 480 Super.
Chart analysis is not extensively shown, but viewers can calculate the performance difference by multiplying the FPS numbers of the 4080 by 1% for the low end or 3% for the upper bound.
The review is simplified due to the minimal changes in the 480 Super.
The video discusses the price per frame chart for the 7800 XTX and the 480 Super, showing the value of the 480 Super has improved with the price drop.
10:22
The 480 Super is considered the worst on the chart in terms of value but lacks some of the nuances that the 490 provides.
The 490 is the only card on the list that the speaker would buy for editing machines due to the vrap, which is not measured in the chart.
The price came down $200 for the 480 Super but is basically the same product.
The value tends to get worse as you go up the stack historically.
The 4070 Super helped to revive some of that, but the TI Super was a bit of a dud.
A chart is displayed to show the value calculation of NVIDIA's full current lineup, indicating an improvement in value for the 4080 Super due to a price drop.
15:02
The chart is based on the dollar per FPS number, where the 460 is the cheapest per FPS at 100%.
The 490 is about half the value of the 460 according to the chart.
The chart does not take into account the fact that lower-tier cards cannot do some of the things higher-tier cards can.
The 480 Super is among the worst on the chart in terms of value but lacks some of the nuances that the 490 provides.
The 480 Super is now the direct alternative to the 480 or 480 super, as the XTX was previously considered too expensive.
💫 FAQs about This YouTube Video

1. What are the key highlights of the NVIDIA 480 Super and AMD RX 7600 XT launch?

The key highlights of the NVIDIA 480 Super and AMD RX 7600 XT launch are the small 1 to 3% improvement of the 480 Super over the original 480, the insignificant difference between the two cards in benchmarking and gaming performance, the noticeable price reduction of the 480 Super from $1,200 to $1,000, and the creation of a tiering difference between the top-end and next down cards by Nvidia.

2. How does the performance of the NVIDIA 480 Super compare to the original 480, according to the video?

According to the video, the performance of the NVIDIA 480 Super is only 1 to 3% better than the original 480. The video also mentions that the 480 Super is functionally the same card as the original 480 for benchmarking and gaming performance, and the difference between the two cards is insignificant.

3. What is the focus of the review of the NVIDIA 480 Super in the video?

The focus of the review of the NVIDIA 480 Super in the video is on the card's value and the changes in the GPU market. The video discusses the price reduction of the 480 Super from $1,200 to $1,000 and analyzes the implications of this price drop on the card's value and the overall market dynamics.

4. Why does the video suggest that the price reduction of the NVIDIA 480 Super may feel like some kind of Stockholm syndrome?

The video suggests that the price reduction of the NVIDIA 480 Super may feel like some kind of Stockholm syndrome because the card's price has moved from complete insanity to moderately deranged. The video highlights the complicated nature of the price drop and the difficulty in fully praising something that has shifted in value.

5. In what capacity does the video mention the 4080 as a potential alternative?

The video mentions the 4080 as a potential alternative in the context of value and pricing. It discusses how the 4080 had a newfound appreciation for efficiency and how its value has improved due to a price drop. The video also suggests that the 4080 could be considered an alternative for those who were previously interested in the 480 or 480 super.